Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arash Estilaf

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 16:59, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arash Estilaf[edit]

Arash Estilaf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and definitely doesn't meet WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 13:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 13:25, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the coverage is not enough to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:51, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I think there's enough Chinese-language coverage to meet WP:GNG.
That's in addition to the two China Daily pieces already cited in the article.[1][2] I'm sure a more thorough search would turn up more sources, but I think these are enough for GNG. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 17:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.